New chart: Pre-approved Plan Eligibility Checklist
(Posted on December 27, 2023 by )


The IRS maintains pre-approved plan programs (1) for retirement plans described in I.R.C. § 401(a) (qualified plans), and (2) for annuity contracts or custodial accounts described in I.R.C. § 403(b) (403(b) plans). A new chart shows what types of plans are and are not eligible to use the pre-approved plan program.

Read more.

New article: Executive Compensation Arrangements for Tax-Exempt Organizations
(Posted on December 6, 2023 by )


Tax-exempt organizations face special legal challenges in developing compensation packages for their executives. A new article, Executive Compensation Arrangements for Tax-Exempt Organizations, published in the Lexis Practice Advisor provides practical guidance on developing benefits for executives of nonprofits.

This article is divided into the following main topics:

  • Executive compensation considerations for tax-exempt entities
  • Excise Tax on Excess Executive Compensation
  • Deferred compensation rules
  • Severance pay
  • Vacation and sick leave plans
  • Performance bonuses and other nonfixed payments
  • Fringe benefits

Read more.

New article: 403(b) Plan Design and Compliance
(Posted on December 6, 2023 by )


A new article, Section 403(b) Plan Design and Compliance, discusses the rules that apply when eligible tax-exempt organizations establish tax-sheltered annuities, custodial accounts, or retirement income accounts, as described in Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (403(b) plans).

This article addresses the following topics:

  • 403(b) Plan Overview
  • Eligible Employers and Employee>
  • ERISA Coverage of 403(b) Plans
  • Qualification Requirements
  • 403(b) Plan Contributions
  • 403(b) Plan Distributions
  • Implementation and Operation
  • Correcting 403(b) Plan Errors
  • Terminating 403(b) Plans
  • EP Subcommittee Report: 403(b) Plan Issues and Recommendations
  • Advantages and Disadvantages of 403(b) Plans

Read more.

New Article: Pre-Approved 403(b) Plans
(Posted on December 6, 2023 by )


On November 21, 2023, the IRS issued Rev. Proc. 2023-37, substantially updating its guidance on preapproved retirement programs described in Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 403(b) (403(b) plans). A new article, Pre-Approved 403(b) Plans, discusses preapproved 403(b) plans, including their advantages, legal pitfalls, and other issues that an eligible employer may consider when determining whether to convert its existing 403(b) plan into a preapproved plan.

The major topics are:

  • What Is a 403(b) Plan?
  • What Are the Advantages of a Preapproved 403(b) Plan?
  • What Are the Legal Pitfalls of a Preapproved 403(b) Plan?
  • What Operational Issues Can Arise for a Preapproved Plan?
  • What Practical Issues Can Arise for a Preapproved Plan?
  • When Should an Employer Adopt a Preapproved 403(b) Plan?
  • Can the Employer Cure Past Plan Issues by Adopting a Preapproved 403(b) Plan?
  • What Should an Employer Do If It Did Not Comply with the Written Plan Document Requirement in the Past?

Read more.

New article: Pre-approved Plan Design and Compliance
(Posted on December 5, 2023 by )


With the IRS cutting back on determination letters for individually designed plans, more and more employers are switching to pre-approved plans. An article recently published in the Lexis Practice Advisor, Pre-Approved Plan Design and Compliance, discusses practical considerations involved with such plans. Topics include:

  • Pre-approved Plan Designs and Favored Regulatory Status
  • General Advantages and Disadvantages of Pre-approved Plans
  • Types and Requirements of Pre-Approved Plans
  • Limitations on Plans That May Be Pre-approved
  • Pre-approved Plan Providers
  • Implementing Pre-Approved Plans
  • Obtaining IRS Opinion Letters

Read more.

New Article: Substantial Risk of Forfeiture Under the IRC
(Posted on December 4, 2023 by )


An article recently published in the Lexis Practice Advisor, Substantial Risk of Forfeiture Under the IRC, discusses the concept of substantial risk of forfeiture (SRF) under sections 83, 409A, 457(f), 457A, and 3121(v)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and the different consequences of the failure to achieve a SRF under each such section.

Topics covered are:

  • Significance of SRF under the Various I.R.C. Sections
  • Definition of SRF
  • Conditions that Generally Support the Existence of a SRF and Related Requirements
  • Conditions that Generally Do Not Support the Existence of a SRF
  • Other rules relating to SRF

It is accompanied by a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture Comparison Chart, which summarizes the rules.

New Article: Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Rules for Tax-Indifferent Entities (Section 457A)
(Posted on December 4, 2023 by )


A new article, Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Rules for Tax-Indifferent Entities (Section 457A), discusses the rules that apply to deferred compensation plans maintained by certain corporations located in tax haven jurisdictions and partnerships owned by such corporations and/or by tax-exempt organizations. Topics covered include:

  • Purpose of Section 457A
  • Application of Section 457A
  • Substantial Risk of Forfeiture
  • Nonqualified Entities
  • Service Providers
  • Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
  • Tax Effect of Section 457A
  • Relationship between Section 457A and FICA Taxes
  • Relationship between Sections 457A and 409A
  • Effective Date and Transitional Rule

Read more.

2024 Social Security Wage Base and Projected IRS Benefits & Contributions Limits
(Posted on October 12, 2023 by )


The Social Security Administration today issued a News Release announcing that the Social Security wage base will rise from $160,200 in 2023 to $168,600 in 2024. In addition, based on the issuance of the CPI-U for September 2023 we have been able to project section 415 and several other IRS limits for 2024.

A chart showing details, and limits from 1996 to 2024, can be found at this link.

SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-up Requirement Notice – Effect on Governmental Plans
(Posted on August 28, 2023 by )


On August 25, 2023, the IRS issued Notice 2023-62, dealing with the SECURE 2.0 requirement that any age 50 catch-up contributions by an employee with prior-year FICA wages over $145,000 (to be indexed with inflation) be made on a Roth basis, rather than a pre-tax basis. The guidance had two effects:

  • The requirement that catch-up contributions for individuals over age 50 with prior-year FICA wages over $145,000 be made in the form of Roth contributions was delayed until 2026.
  • The language of the statute had suggested that no catch-up contributions could be made at all beginning in 2024. The IRS has confirmed that it will continue to treat catch-up contributions as permissible.

While the guidance applies to 401(k) plans, most governmental entities are not permitted to have 401(k) plans. However, it also affects governmental 457(b) plans, along with 403(b) plans for those governmental entities that are permitted to have 403(b) plans (governmental instrumentalities that also have tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3), and public schools and universities). It is particularly significant for governmental entities which maintain both 403(b) and 457(b) plans, since an employee is able to double the usual amount of catch-ups by making a catch-up election with respect to both plans.

The IRS also announced its intention to issue further guidance in three areas:

  • In determining whether an individual has $145,000 in FICA wages, wages exempt from FICA will not be counted. Among other things, this would mean that state and local government entities not subject to Social Security would not have to comply with the new rules at all.
  • For a participant in a multiple employer plan with compensation from two or more participating employers, the determination of whether the Roth catch-up rule applies would be made on an employer-by-employer basis. So for example, in a statewide plan, compensation that an individual received from one governmental employer would not have to be combined with that from another in applying the $145,000 limit.
  • When the new rules become effective in 2026, a plan may treat a pre-tax catch-up election for a participant subject to the Roth catch-up rule as though it were a Roth catch-up election, without the need to obtain an updated election from the participant. For example, suppose that a participant over age 50 with compensation of $145,000 elects to make a contribution of 25% of compensation. The maximum for 2023 (without catch-ups) would be $22,500. Assuming this limit were still in effect in 2026 (it rises with inflation), the employer would not need to get a separate election in order to have an additional $7,500 taken from the participant’s compensation and contributed on a Roth basis.

While these three points would be helpful to impacted plan sponsors, they are not yet the IRS’s formal position.

General information on the effect of the notice (for nongovernmental as well as governmental plans) can be found at this link. Information on the amount of regular and catch-up contributions can be found at this link.